.jpg)
Operations management is changing. For years, outsourcing was the go-to for cutting costs and accessing talent. Now companies are choosing Global Capability Centers over vendors. The GCC vs outsourcing debate isn't about which is cheaper. It's about control, security, and innovation. Understanding this GCC vs outsourcing comparison is critical for growth.
The numbers tell the story. The market for GCC has shifted from $128.5 billion in 2023 to $300+ billion by 2032. There are more than 1,700 centers in India employing 2 million people. Walmart and Goldman Sachs use GCCs for next-generation products.
When you do outsourcing, you are renting someone else's team. They have several clients to juggle and they all have different processes. A GCC? You own it, run it, and everyone works for you. This shift in GCC outsourcing vs in-house operations changes everything.
With outsourcing, vendors take 20-40% markup. With a GCC, that money stays with you. You control hiring, training, and performance.
The shift from outsourcing to GCCs isn't happening by accident. Companies are running into real walls with their traditional relationships with vendors, walls that cost them money, slow the pace of innovation, and endanger their competitive advantages. Here are the deeper reasons for this change:
You can't safely outsource AI transformation. Training models, testing algorithms, working with proprietary data, these need direct control. GCCs give you people working with your systems and data without IP leaking to vendors.
In financial services, healthcare, or tech, compliance gets brutal. Spread work across five outsourcing vendors and consistent governance becomes impossible. A GCC brings everything under one roof, making regulatory compliance easier.
Good engineers, data scientists, product managers, they want careers, not project work. GCCs offer a path to leadership in your organization. Outsourcing firms bleed talent at 20-30% annually. GCCs? Usually half that, because people feel invested in where the company's going.
Need to change your product roadmap? Scale a team fast? With outsourcing, you're stuck in contract renegotiations for every change. In a GCC, your leadership makes the call and it happens. No vendor sign-offs, no amendments, no delays.
Theory is one thing, but how does this work on the models side byside? When you break down GCC outsourcing vs in-house operations across the factors that really matter. These include ownership, costs, talent, and speed, the differences become crystal clear.
Companies aren't moving to GCC's because it's cool. They're doing it because outsourcing was no longer providing them what they need.
If you're dealing with complex technology, sensitive data, or building products that separate you from competitors, evaluating GCC outsourcing vs in-house operations becomes crucial. Yes, there's upfront investment. But it pays back through knowledge that stays, IP that's protected, and teams that grow with your business.
Transitioning from outsourcing to a Global Capability Center involves multiple considerations, including entity setup, and talent acquisition. Whether you are assessing GCC outsourcing vs in-house operations for the first time or planning your next phase of growth, Bacancy brings hands-on experience in helping enterprises design and operationalise scalable GCC models.
With Bacancy as a strategic partner, you gain clarity, structure, and execution support to build a Global Capability Center. Schedule aconsultation call to discuss your requirements and receive a tailored roadmap for establishing your GCC.
Moving from outsourcing to a GCC isn't simple, you've got entity setup, talent acquisition, regulatory compliance, tech infrastructure to handle. Whether you're evaluating GCC outsourcing vs in-house operations for the first time or ready to move, we at Bacancy GCC can show you what it takes to get a GCC running that delivers from day one.
Schedule a consultation call to talk through your situation and get a roadmap for building your Global Capability Center.